But how would it be economical to remove the armor belt that is welded/riveted onto the hull only to replace it later? Unless that was something you added to the ship to begin with...
_________________ Worklist:
Puerto Oeste - AU - WWI-WWII
Posts:3910 Joined: November 17th, 2010, 8:03 am
Location: Corinth, MS USA
Contact:YouTube
The rebuild of the four Italian BBs was truly a marvel of engineering. According to a book I have, the Cavour-class had a new bow built OVER the existing one, while the Duilio-class ships were given totally new bows altogether.
Posts:489 Joined: July 27th, 2010, 1:47 am
Location: In the study, with the Candlestick
Contact:Website
I misread, I think...if the ship was built with a bow to stearn belt, better to leave it probably. Could throw off the ship's stability. If this was New-build, then definately go all or nothing, then.
_________________ World's Best Okayest Author and Artist
Posts:92 Joined: August 14th, 2011, 9:05 am
Location: Indiana, USA
I think I'm going to put this ship on hold for awhile. I'm going to start on the cruisers for now. But I promise I will come back the the Bayern modernization.