Shipbucket

Ah, stupid question I guess. Better safe than sorry.

Sure they could. They could even depress the barrels a couple of degrees. How else would you expect to deal with torpedo bombers?

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.

Sometimes I feel like I'm such an idiot.

Mate...never put yourself down. We are all learning (even those who think they are experts) so just relax and let those creative juices flow. You will always have negative comments about your work but remember the positives too. Then learn from them. I am passionate about my work but also very receptive to all forms of feedback.

_________________
There is no "I" in TEAM but there is a ME


______________________
Current Worklist:
Redrawing my entire AU after a long absence from Shipbucket

Heh, thanks for the encouragement mate!

I've fixed the details Hood mentioned.

FURTHER UPDATED: last post before this one.

It's unconventional, but the quality of the drawing is good, and It has a certain appeal.

_________________
𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐇𝐍𝐄𝐓- 𝑻𝒐 𝑪𝒐𝒈𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆

Thanks! What can I do to further improve the drawing?

Well, the aircraft looks rather crude compared to the rest of the drawing.
I'd dispense with all the wires above the catapult since they're only going to get in the way of the crane and such.
Instead I'd place a second mast where you've got the aft 40mm gun and either move the gun further aft to the edge of the deck house or move it out on the beam.
You'll also need a rather larger crane for the boats.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.