Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 72 of 90  [ 900 posts ]  Go to page « 170 71 72 73 7490 »
Author Message
Ashley
Post subject: The 1959 destroyer-class: Z-85Posted: March 30th, 2012, 11:40 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 582
Joined: August 17th, 2010, 7:45 am
Location: Gone to hell
The 1959s new destroyer-class Z-85. With a displacement 3500 tons smaller than its afterwar predecessors and much lesser armed but specialised for the ASW-role. Therefor she was eqipped with the new 'Dohle'-lightweight-torpedo, a 15" ASW-torpedo with a first stage rocket instead of the much heavier 'Geier'-torpedo. The 'Dohle'-torpedos are fired from a massive 12x-launcher amidships. Two 12,8cm twin-DPs on the foredeck and two 5,5cm twins on the hangar do the gunnery-jobs. A new 6x launcher for 'Taifun C'-SAMs on the hangar complete the armamanet of the ship. The big flight deck and hanger support four helicopters, each armed with two lightweight torpedos. Z-85 is fitted with a complex radar-equipment. She is able to coordinate aa-action with other ships. Further Z-85 is equipped with the big 'Lauscher'-forward-sonar.
Her prime mission is detection and tracking of subs at atlantic waters around the germanian empire. 32 ships are ordered of the first batch, they will replace the old 1936-class DDs.
[ img ]

_________________
This is a serious forum. Do not laugh. Do not post nonsens. Do not be kiddish. At least, not all the time.
Current work list:
go on playing dead


Last edited by Ashley on March 30th, 2012, 1:22 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Ashley
Post subject: Z-36 class 1952 refitPosted: March 30th, 2012, 12:58 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 582
Joined: August 17th, 2010, 7:45 am
Location: Gone to hell
For comparision here is the 1936 class destroyer with afterwar refit. The guns are replaced by two 12,8cm twin-DPs. The old torpedo launchers are replaced by one 'Geier'-triple launcher. AA is now one 3cm-quad and two 5,5cm-twins.
The modern armament requires adequate radars and sonar, too. But the most structural change are the 12,8cm twin turrets. They penetrate two or three decks (I'm not really sure) and make extensive internal rebuilings necessary.
So refitting the old destroyers was not accepted by the OKM, the plan was rejected and the prewar destroyers were sold or scrapped within the 60s.
[ img ]

_________________
This is a serious forum. Do not laugh. Do not post nonsens. Do not be kiddish. At least, not all the time.
Current work list:
go on playing dead


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Ashley
Post subject: Z-85 class 2nd batch Z-102Posted: March 30th, 2012, 1:57 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 582
Joined: August 17th, 2010, 7:45 am
Location: Gone to hell
With Z-102 the design was changed slightly. The 5,5cm aa-gun went to the very aft, the flight deck was shortened therefor and ecm-devices were installed.
[ img ]

_________________
This is a serious forum. Do not laugh. Do not post nonsens. Do not be kiddish. At least, not all the time.
Current work list:
go on playing dead


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
emperor_andreas
Post subject: Re: Kriegsmarine 1946, second approachPosted: March 30th, 2012, 8:13 pm
Offline
Posts: 3910
Joined: November 17th, 2010, 8:03 am
Location: Corinth, MS USA
Contact: YouTube
I LOVE those ships! Keep up the great work; can't wait to see the history of the Deutschlands! Also: please tell us what happens to the 'Big Four' in this AU...are Gneisenau, Scharnhorst, Bismarck, and Tirpitz sunk, sold for scrap, or do they become museum ships? Personally I think all four deserve the latter honor, but it's your AU. :)

-Matt

_________________
[ img ]
MS State Guard - 08 March 2014 - 28 January 2023

The Official IJN Ships & Planes List

#FJB


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Ashley
Post subject: BC Constantin von AlvenslebenPosted: April 3rd, 2012, 2:27 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 582
Joined: August 17th, 2010, 7:45 am
Location: Gone to hell
The Alvensleben was a single ship class designed after Seydlitz. It featured a superior firepower with its 15"-guns.
Tech. data: length 193m, displacement 25.000 tons empty, 28500 tons max., prop 80000 hp, vmax 28,2 knots.
Arms: 3x2x38cm, 14x15cm, 12x8,8cm in casemats, 4x8,8cm aa 5x50cm torpedotube
[ img ]
Due to several technical problems the germans were glad the ship was stricken with the Washington treaty.

_________________
This is a serious forum. Do not laugh. Do not post nonsens. Do not be kiddish. At least, not all the time.
Current work list:
go on playing dead


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Biancini1995
Post subject: Re: Kriegsmarine 1946, second approachPosted: April 3rd, 2012, 11:38 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 744
Joined: August 19th, 2011, 7:54 pm
nice ship ashley

_________________
Verusea Alternative Universe is starting to build up.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Carthaginian
Post subject: Re: Kriegsmarine 1946, second approachPosted: April 4th, 2012, 5:00 am
Offline
Posts: 587
Joined: July 30th, 2010, 7:25 pm
Location: Daphne, Alabama, C.S.A.
She'd have made a frightening opponent for Refit and Repair.
What problems with machinery? Was she one of their odd steam/diesel propulsion experiments?


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Clonecommander6454
Post subject: Re: Kriegsmarine 1946, second approachPosted: April 4th, 2012, 6:49 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 760
Joined: August 8th, 2011, 2:35 pm
I think one turret forward and two after isn't the greatest idea.
Those small guns mid-ship is also too close together IMO.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Ashley
Post subject: Re: Kriegsmarine 1946, second approachPosted: April 4th, 2012, 7:07 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 582
Joined: August 17th, 2010, 7:45 am
Location: Gone to hell
Clonecommander6454 wrote:
I think one turret forward and two after isn't the greatest idea.
It is if you want to optimize weight distribution. It just looks odd 'cause very most warships with three turrets wear two of them on the fore deck.

_________________
This is a serious forum. Do not laugh. Do not post nonsens. Do not be kiddish. At least, not all the time.
Current work list:
go on playing dead


Last edited by Ashley on April 4th, 2012, 9:16 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Ashley
Post subject: Re: Kriegsmarine 1946, second approachPosted: April 4th, 2012, 9:05 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 582
Joined: August 17th, 2010, 7:45 am
Location: Gone to hell
Carthaginian wrote:
She'd have made a frightening opponent for Refit and Repair.
What problems with machinery? Was she one of their odd steam/diesel propulsion experiments?
To early for diesel. She was fitted wis high pressure steam turbines. They were a pure pain in the ass for any engineer. Further the new 15" gun (two years before Bayern-class) was a big step forward. It made a very large turret neccessary and it was believed the barbette had to be as oversized. The turning mechanism failed sometimes.

Now what do we do with big good looking ship with that problems and only 10 years old? You can't sell her you can't use her without heartattack. Rebuilding would cost nearly as much as a new ship.

_________________
This is a serious forum. Do not laugh. Do not post nonsens. Do not be kiddish. At least, not all the time.
Current work list:
go on playing dead


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 72 of 90  [ 900 posts ]  Return to “Alternate Universe Designs” | Go to page « 170 71 72 73 7490 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]