Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 2 of 2  [ 20 posts ]  Go to page « 1 2
Author Message
Novice
Post subject: Re: I am back with some stuff.Posted: April 13th, 2013, 4:28 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 4126
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:25 am
Location: Vrijstaat
GLACIESFIRE wrote:
Sorry who or what is on top of the first "service boat"?!?
That is ALVAMA's dream :lol:

_________________
[ img ] Thank you Kim for the crest

"Never fear to try on something new. Remember that the Titanic was built by professionals, and the Ark by an amateur"


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
ALVAMA
Post subject: Re: I am back with some stuff.Posted: April 13th, 2013, 4:38 pm
Novice wrote:
GLACIESFIRE wrote:
Sorry who or what is on top of the first "service boat"?!?
That is ALVAMA's dream :lol:
Stttt!!! It was my little secret :(


Top
[Quote]
ALVAMA
Post subject: Re: I am back with some stuff.Posted: April 13th, 2013, 4:40 pm
Thanks for all nice comments and compliments! I have update the drawing a little and added a CoA! Also Kirov itself and Kiev and Kuznetsov classes follow (Pr.1943 and 1944, and I hope 1941 too)


Top
[Quote]
TimothyC
Post subject: Re: I am back with some stuff.Posted: April 13th, 2013, 6:05 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3765
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:06 am
Contact: Website
Colosseum wrote:
I would be interested to see that official length from that book. ;)
I would also. Until we see it, I'm operating under the assumption that you've simply miss-scaled the drawing.

_________________
๐Œ๐€๐“๐‡๐๐„๐“- ๐‘ป๐’ ๐‘ช๐’๐’ˆ๐’Š๐’•๐’‚๐’•๐’† ๐’‚๐’๐’… ๐’•๐’ ๐‘บ๐’๐’๐’—๐’†


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
ALVAMA
Post subject: Re: I am back with some stuff.Posted: April 13th, 2013, 9:22 pm
TimothyC wrote:
Colosseum wrote:
I would be interested to see that official length from that book. ;)
I would also. Until we see it, I'm operating under the assumption that you've simply miss-scaled the drawing.
No I have not mis-scalled the drawing, since you should not read fucking American sources. Most guys here are ''Simply''
And since I have to prove myself again for this fucking retared world, I am not wonna waste my time and Explain it. So joooooo laters.


Top
[Quote]
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: I am back with some stuff.Posted: April 13th, 2013, 9:27 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7510
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
I am actually wondering too, what the real sizes of the kirov then should be, for use in my reference database? if all western sources are incorrect, I suppose you have better references, which I should then use?

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Colosseum
Post subject: Re: I am back with some stuff.Posted: April 13th, 2013, 9:34 pm
Offline
Posts: 5218
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 9:38 pm
Location: Austin, TX
Contact: Website
ALVAMA wrote:
TimothyC wrote:
Colosseum wrote:
I would be interested to see that official length from that book. ;)
I would also. Until we see it, I'm operating under the assumption that you've simply miss-scaled the drawing.
No I have not mis-scalled the drawing, since you should not read fucking American sources. Most guys here are ''Simply''
And since I have to prove myself again for this fucking retared world, I am not wonna waste my time and Explain it. So joooooo laters.
I was actually curious to see what your sources said... if they are different than the "fucking American sources", I'm interested to see them. I don't know what you mean by "Most guys here are "simply"".

As for "having to prove myself", well it shouldn't be an issue at all to just post what you used for reference. ;) :)

_________________
USN components, camouflage colors, & reference links (World War II only)


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Gollevainen
Post subject: Re: I am back with some stuff.Posted: April 14th, 2013, 8:19 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 4714
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:10 am
Location: Finland
Contact: Website
There's no call for this "artist rage" if people are simply asking what lenght you used to scale the drawing.

And what comes to western sources, yes at some cases exspecially when dating back to the cold war era it might be inaccurate. But is it a really the proplem in this case? Let me give you an examble.

-Apalkov gives in his series of books about VMF ships pr.1144 overall lenght of 251m and 228m on waterline.
-Morskaya Kollektsiya gives it overall lenght 250m
-A.N. Sokolov gives it lenght 252m overall
-A.S. Pavlov gives it overall lenght 251.2m

So I say it's rather legimite question to ask what lenght/source you used for scaling it becouse there is some variation even with the russian sources regarding the lenght.

And nothing justifies faul language and unpolite manners in this forum.

_________________
Shipbucket mainsite, aka "The Archive"
New AU project "Aravala"


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
MihoshiK
Post subject: Re: I am back with some stuff.Posted: April 14th, 2013, 7:05 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1035
Joined: October 16th, 2010, 11:06 pm
Location: In orbit, watching you draw.
Contact: Website
ALVAMA wrote:

No I have not mis-scalled the drawing, since you should not read fucking American sources. Most guys here are ''Simply''
Implying that posters with serious questions and serious concerns, amongst which a mod and an admin, are "simple" is NOT going to fly. You WILL recant that statement, or there WILL be trouble.
Quote:
And since I have to prove myself again for this fucking retared world, I am not wonna waste my time and Explain it. So joooooo laters.
You have to prove yourself (or rather, your sources) because everyone has to do that if there are serious doubts as to the veracity of said sources. If there's one thing this forum prides itself on, it's getting the scale as good as possible. I mean, I'm not going to back a complaint about a pixel or two, but if there's doubts in the meters range, than that's a lot.

So, as I said, you will take back the name-calling, and you will kindly provide your super-duper sources.
Within a day or two, PLEASE.

_________________
Would you please not eat my gun...
[ img ]


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
ALVAMA
Post subject: Re: I am back with some stuff.Posted: April 15th, 2013, 10:56 pm
I do apology for the hard and aggresive comment from my side. My source is a EM plan aboard the Kirovs. - Done.


Top
[Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 2 of 2  [ 20 posts ]  Return to โ€œFD Scale Drawingsโ€ | Go to page « 1 2

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]