Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 2 of 2  [ 15 posts ]  Go to page « 1 2
Author Message
foxnews4u
Post subject: Re: Skjold classPosted: February 19th, 2012, 10:23 pm
Offline
Posts: 62
Joined: February 15th, 2012, 1:00 pm
Location: the fridge
she is ready.
Attachment:
(versatile)original.png

_________________
anything can be done about something.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
heuhen
Post subject: Re: Skjold classPosted: February 20th, 2012, 12:12 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 9102
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!
1. you have removed the bow.
2. Skjold is all about stealth. Not to be able to be seen on radars. yours. with cutouts in the hull (something there is no place for), that WW2ish gun, that small crane on the foredeck, railings.
3. The communication mast you have moved from aft to the side on the superstructure is not a good solution.
4. Have you ever seen a black rubber strip in a yellow color?!
5. The hull was designed for only a ship that is max. 50 meter. If larger you have to design a totally new hull.

Skjold class is build on something called SES "Surface Effect Ship"
http://www.globalspec.com/reference/650 ... fect-ships


If you going to post totally silly thing this is not the place. We at SB demand ship design that is plausible. But from time to time we do things like this just to get other to laugh.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
foxnews4u
Post subject: Re: Skjold classPosted: February 20th, 2012, 12:35 am
Offline
Posts: 62
Joined: February 15th, 2012, 1:00 pm
Location: the fridge
what? i told you butcher. i made a whole new design, i just thought i'd show you what i did. this is an amphibious assault landing/support craft.

_________________
anything can be done about something.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
klagldsf
Post subject: Re: Skjold classPosted: February 20th, 2012, 4:56 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2765
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 4:14 pm
...what the....

Well as far as a landing craft goes it's not too bad. There's a bit of redundancy in how many small-caliber weapons you have and the howitzer is admittedly novel.
foxnews4u wrote:
i told you butcher.
I'm not sure what you're getting at but heuhen isn't trying to deliberately antagonize you.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
foxnews4u
Post subject: Re: Skjold classPosted: February 20th, 2012, 5:13 am
Offline
Posts: 62
Joined: February 15th, 2012, 1:00 pm
Location: the fridge
this guy is right... i enjoy building stuff. for the sake of looking at it. i worked at this for at least 5-6 hours straight. maybe more.
but for the small arms.. those emplacements go in only a bit... because there is a bay below for amphibious assault vehicles only.
they are in-case of any fights that take place right on the ship... say sabetours. only in the case that it is on op. the howitzer is from the auto-cannon ENRR and LITTLE BIRD did. i just re-colored it. it is for the spport of launched mechanized vehicles. supporting them until they reach the shore. once ashore, it can continue to fire inland a bit.

_________________
anything can be done about something.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 2 of 2  [ 15 posts ]  Return to “FD Scale Drawings” | Go to page « 1 2

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 29 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]